While in New Hampshire recently (for the wedding of my amazing niece), I was able to get some shots of one of my favorite nature photo subjects - a waterfall.
Jackson Falls in Jackson, NH is my favorite type of waterfall. It's in an intimate setting, and the water flow is relatively slow (or at least it was the weekend we were there). The water level allows you to walk almost anywhere to compose photos. And the multi-level rocky terrain provides lots of different miniature scenes for great shots.
Here's the best images of "miniature scenes" I captured from Jackson Falls:
My favorite parts of these shots are the bits of color provided by the moss and the fall leaves. If they weren't there, these would be dull images of white water and brownish-gray rocks. A pop of color makes all the difference, and that's what I looked for.
The water flow itself is depicted differently in the first shot, where a faster shutter speed (1/250) captured the "details" of the water. The second and third shots used a much slower shutter speed (1/25 and 1/20, respectively) to smooth out the water.
The third shot is my favorite. It may make it in to my Nature gallery.
As I've discussed in the past on this blog, the photography term "bokeh" refers to an out-of-focus area of an image. A photo is often considered to have "good bokeh" if those areas have a smooth, silky look, or are generally pleasing to the eye.
I could describe the many ways that the word "bokeh" is pronounced, but that's a whole other discussion that I'd rather not get in to.
I could also discuss the many ways that good bokeh is achieved. But I don't want to make this an instructional post. I'm also no expert on the subject. I just know the way I do it.
It all has to do with depth-of-field - i.e. the in-focus depth of the image. Therefore lens and aperture choice have something to do with it, as does your distance to the subject, since they all affect depth-of-field.
The other day I decided to take advantage of a nice day and grab some images in my backyard. I used my telephoto lens (my favorite), and I was able to frame some shots in such a way as to generate some nice green background...backyard...bokeh.
Here's the best three shots of the day. (In the first two images, the green background is actually just the grass in my backyard.)
Good bokeh makes for a good background, and good backgrounds are necessary for good photos.
That's pretty good - somebody oughta put that on a coffee mug or something.
I'm a photography fan, obviously. But I'm also a fan of writing. I enjoy "wordsmithing" a message, in an effort to express an opinion or convey a feeling in an engaging and eloquent way.
As a case in point, I rewrote the preceding sentence about 3 times before I got it just right.
Anywho, the reason I bring this up is that my love of writing is the reason this blog often contains so much verbiage to go along with the images.
But I need to remember that, technically, this is a "photoblog". So, by definition, it is to contain photos, with brief captions, and that's it. There should be no need to babble on and on about some obscure topic that's remotely related to the image in question, or the camera equipment used to create the photo, or the location at which it was taken, or the post-processing that was performed on it, resulting in run-on sentences with multiple clauses and seemingly no end.
So, here's a photo:
It's the front grille and lights of a stainless steel 1936 Ford sedan on display at the Heinz History Center in Pittsburgh, PA. I did not apply a monochrome treatment to it - this is the true coloring, with a little enhancement of the yellow/orange reflections from the overhead lights, which I thought was a nice effect.
Flowers are all about color. But I recently saw some flower shots by other photographers that were rendered in monochrome (black and white), and that inspired me to try the same thing.
That's really just a polite way of saying that I ripped off their idea.
Let's say I was inspired.
This first shot is interesting because it's got that "repeated pattern" thing going on -- in other words, the flowers in the background look a lot like the one in the foreground.
Next we have what I think is a hydrangea. It's a big flower with a lot of detail, so I thought it made a good candidate for monochrome.
The last one is my favorite, just because of the detail in the flower petals, the various degrees of light and shadow, and just generally because I think it's a cool shot. I think it's the best of the three shots.
These were all taken at Longwood Gardens, and I've got a ton of flower shots from that day. Most of them are really best seen in vibrant color because, of course, that's how flowers look their best. But I chose the 3 images above for a monochrome treatment because I thought the color(s) of the flower itself weren't as important. There was enough interest in the shape of the petals, the setting of the flower itself, and the light and shadow in the photo.
I swear I'm trying to get away from these flower images, but they seem to keep filling up this blog. I wish I could tell you what's "coming up next", but things are very fluid at this point, so I have no idea what images I'll have available to post next. There's a good chance it'll be more flowers, but you never know.
As I like to say, stay tuned.
I shoot a lot of flower images. I know it. I can't help it. They're colorful, they stand still, and let's face it, people love flower shots.
Still, I thought I'd shake things up a bit by posting some plant life shots without big colorful flower petals - images that are instead mostly greenery.
These shots were all taken along a hiking trail at Watkins Glen State Park (NY).
First, we have some greenery that's familiar to most - the classic fern. I saw this little guy where you see most ferns - in the shade of a tree.
This next shot is a little abstract. These are lily pads, floating on a pond. It's almost disorienting to look at, because there's no frame of reference - I filled the frame with the lily pads.
Finally we have a shot of a wild flower. I know, I said I was getting away from flower shots. But I meant those bright big-petaled flowers. This little fellow has just a touch of yellow, and I was able to get a nice, blurry, greenish-yellow background.
As it turns out, "Greenery" is actually the name of the Pantone "Color of the Year" for 2017. Who knew?
All nature photographers love the coming of spring. It's tough getting nature shots - trees, flowers, wildlife, etc. - in the dead of winter.
But things have warmed up, where I live anyway. So it's time to post some springtime shots.
The irony here is that the images below are actually a couple years old. I'm a bit behind in processing my travel photos from the past several years, as you may have noticed if you're a regular reader of mine. (And if you are, thanks for reading. This blog has been less active than usual lately.)
So, as I said, these are older shots. But they still call to mind Spring and the fact that it has, you know, sprung.
They're all flower shots. The first flowers are little white thingies with a bright yellow center:
Next, some red thingamajigs:
Next we have some white whatchamacallits:
Finally, my favorite, a yellow thingamabob that sort of looks like a goldenrod, but I have no idea if that's what it is:
I wish I could accurately identify each of these, but I can't. I have a good amount of experience photographing flowers and nature, but my knowledge of what I'm shooting is very limited. (There are apps for that, but they don't always work.)
I was able to get a clean, green, blurry background for all of these, which really makes the flower pop.
All of these images are from the garden of the Nathaniel Russell House in Charleston, SC. If you're in Charleston, I recommend a visit there. Here's a link. It's worth it just to see the staircase. (You'll see what I mean when you get there.)
Enjoy spring. And thanks for reading.
Bodies of water are fun to shoot, whether you're looking at a river, a lake, a waterfall, or just a trickling mountain stream. And you can achieve a different feel for a water image by varying the light, the time of day, and the surroundings.
Charleston, South Carolina is a city on the water, and while there I created a few images that each have different feels.
This image was taken in the bright sunshine, capturing the meandering patches of grassy sections at the banks of the harbor. I liked the zigzag pattern that I was able to capture in the frame:
Moving from a harbor to a river, here's a shot that was taken in the shade, with the image framed by over-hanging trees. This, by the way, is the Ashley River, near Drayton Hall Plantation:
Finally, my favorite, a sunset shot taken from Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor. I was able to get some rocks in the foreground to anchor the shot, and I got a nice sun reflection on the water.
So, we went from happy and sunny, to shady and subdued, to dark and serene - three shots, three moods.
First, let me apologize for, once again, not posting anything here for quite some time. 2017 has been a busy year so far, but unfortunately not for photography. I haven't taken the ol' Nikon out in a long time. (Technically, it's "out" - sitting on my desk - but these days it's being used as more of a paperweight than an image-capturing device.)
But, to keep this blog alive, I didn't want to go quiet for too long. So, since I don't have any recent shots to share, I thought I'd mine some of my older images. These are photos I haven't shared here before.
I actually looked back a couple years, to a great trip my wife and I took to Georgia and South Carolina - Savannah and Charleston to be exact. Savannah was especially photogenic. I noticed, as I looked back over my shots from that trip, that I took several that were nice close-ups of the amazing statuary in that town. Here's a few that turned out well.
First, a shot that I call "Lonely Statue". It's a close-up of a statue of a girl I saw outside one of Savannah's amazing doorways. It was somewhat hidden at the bottom of a staircase, by itself, and I just thought the girl looked lonely. Anyway, I gave the image a black-and-white treatment, because I thought it looked best that way:
Next we have an image of a lion that's "guarding" one of the many city "squares" in Savannah. I think it's actually guarding a larger statue at the center of the square, but I don't remember which statue, or which square. (I could probably look it up, but I'm betting you probably don't really care.) Anyway, the star of this shot is the nice background - a key element in any photo:
Finally, we have the image that I think is the best of the bunch. This is a close-up of
« Older Posts
All original photographs © Mark Ali. All Rights Reserved.